<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Enterprise 2.0 A Crock? The Practitioners Answer&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/</link>
	<description>Enterprise 2.0 Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clint</title>
		<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-99632</link>
		<dc:creator>clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/#comment-99632</guid>
		<description>Did BAH publish their analysis of the reply all costs? Would be interesting to read that report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did BAH publish their analysis of the reply all costs? Would be interesting to read that report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis ONeil</title>
		<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-90873</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis ONeil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/#comment-90873</guid>
		<description>Collaboration is, in some loose way synonymous with 'open'. Compliance is often related to 'closed'. So these immediately invoke a feeling of contradiction. In fact, a Compliance Culture is enabled through Collaboration. And the enterprise is moving in this direction as a control measure for costs and time spent on regulations and guidelines. This maybe says it better...http://bit.ly/CompCollabMarry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collaboration is, in some loose way synonymous with &#8216;open&#8217;. Compliance is often related to &#8216;closed&#8217;. So these immediately invoke a feeling of contradiction. In fact, a Compliance Culture is enabled through Collaboration. And the enterprise is moving in this direction as a control measure for costs and time spent on regulations and guidelines. This maybe says it better&#8230;http://bit.ly/CompCollabMarry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Christensen</title>
		<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-81204</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/#comment-81204</guid>
		<description>The internal cost of $250K for a reply all isn't going to go away...that cost will continue in the form of employees made imperceptibly faster by having one less email. Business requires sustained and on-going improvements in productivity, accuracy and quality so they can provide greater value to their customers with improved service, better information availability and easier buying decisions: this is company to company, primarily, and requires acknowledgement that these companies run their business' on Enterprise systems. Not consumers that float around adopting different "systems" through consumer spending.

For a new perspective on e2.0, read this: http://tinyurl.com/EvolutionBegins 

Hope this fosters a broader discussion than the current view of E2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The internal cost of $250K for a reply all isn&#8217;t going to go away&#8230;that cost will continue in the form of employees made imperceptibly faster by having one less email. Business requires sustained and on-going improvements in productivity, accuracy and quality so they can provide greater value to their customers with improved service, better information availability and easier buying decisions: this is company to company, primarily, and requires acknowledgement that these companies run their business&#8217; on Enterprise systems. Not consumers that float around adopting different &#8220;systems&#8221; through consumer spending.</p>
<p>For a new perspective on e2.0, read this: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/EvolutionBegins" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/EvolutionBegins</a> </p>
<p>Hope this fosters a broader discussion than the current view of E2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrudula Paladugu</title>
		<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-78965</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrudula Paladugu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/#comment-78965</guid>
		<description>Companies who readily upgrades with new tools and business cultures can only survive the competition and be benefited in today’s economic climate. The enterprises 2.0 reinvents and aligns employees' roles in more independent way with organizational goals creating social, technological, business and economical advancements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies who readily upgrades with new tools and business cultures can only survive the competition and be benefited in today’s economic climate. The enterprises 2.0 reinvents and aligns employees&#8217; roles in more independent way with organizational goals creating social, technological, business and economical advancements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nenshad Bardoliwalla</title>
		<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-75296</link>
		<dc:creator>Nenshad Bardoliwalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enterprise2blog.com/2009/11/is-enterprise-2-0-a-crock-the-practitioners-answer/#comment-75296</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,

As I posted on your other blog as well, I made a very serious attempt to bridge the perspectives in my blog post entitled "Is Enterprise 2.0 a Savior or a Charlatan? How Strategy-Driven Execution can pave the path to proving legitimate business performance" located here: http://bit.ly/3n325o

I would certainly welcome your feedback and look forward to a continued dialogue around the topic.

Best Regards,

Nenshad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p>As I posted on your other blog as well, I made a very serious attempt to bridge the perspectives in my blog post entitled &#8220;Is Enterprise 2.0 a Savior or a Charlatan? How Strategy-Driven Execution can pave the path to proving legitimate business performance&#8221; located here: <a href="http://bit.ly/3n325o" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3n325o</a></p>
<p>I would certainly welcome your feedback and look forward to a continued dialogue around the topic.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Nenshad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
