<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google goes Chrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enterprise2blog.com/2008/09/google-goes-chrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2008/09/google-goes-chrome/</link>
	<description>Enterprise 2.0 Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://enterprise2blog.com/2008/09/google-goes-chrome/comment-page-1/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enterprise2blog.com/2008/09/google-goes-chrome/#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>I recently noticed that Chrome makes it very hard to use pop-up browsers on a site.  The new popup moves it way to the bottom of the screen in a minimized format and requires a few clicks to maximize.  Took me a while to even see that it had been acknowledged.

The pop-up has been abused by SPAM, but there are still sites and applications that require a secondary browser in order to support various tasks.  There is no means to "allow popups for this site" as other browsers have done - unless the site is integrated within the Google Gears infrastructure.  

I found this forced behavior interesting.  Does this mean that their intention is to re-invent the way that sites build out and especially for any pop-up tasks?

I will say that I have made Chrome my default (for now) - more because of the curiosity factor, and because they really do focus your attention on the content and less on the frame in which it is delivered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently noticed that Chrome makes it very hard to use pop-up browsers on a site.  The new popup moves it way to the bottom of the screen in a minimized format and requires a few clicks to maximize.  Took me a while to even see that it had been acknowledged.</p>
<p>The pop-up has been abused by SPAM, but there are still sites and applications that require a secondary browser in order to support various tasks.  There is no means to &#8220;allow popups for this site&#8221; as other browsers have done - unless the site is integrated within the Google Gears infrastructure.  </p>
<p>I found this forced behavior interesting.  Does this mean that their intention is to re-invent the way that sites build out and especially for any pop-up tasks?</p>
<p>I will say that I have made Chrome my default (for now) - more because of the curiosity factor, and because they really do focus your attention on the content and less on the frame in which it is delivered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
